The other article I had found that you had written flows entirely into what you said today about the value of that local connection and people would not like politicians as a group but like the work of individuals. You wrote pretty boldly here that the single member plurality, which we usually call here first past the post, is “a truly awful electoral system”.
Is it fair to say from that if we can hang on to the local representation aspect so citizens don't lose that, the reform to a fair voting system, you would think from your studies that is healthy for democracy?