Thank you.
My second question is still for both of you.
During the election campaign, the Prime Minister announced that he wanted to change the voting system. However, before consultation was under way, before the committee was formed, and before a decision was made, the Prime Minister already rejected the status quo as an option. He expressed his personal preference in various interviews and on various occasions.
Do you think it is fair that, in this process that some see as legitimate and others not so much, the status quo is rejected even before the process is under way?