If your committee comes up with a proposal like the one the Law Commission is proposing, it developed independently—there were no politicians in our group or anyone who had been in politics—you would be perceived as caring about the system more than the short-term election perspective. You would be setting up a system that would favour a greater diversity and a greater taking care of the opinions of one another in order to come up with a good policy for Canada.
I don't see how people would think that you have a conflict of interest. To the contrary, possibly they would think that you put aside your conflict of interest, because you were all elected with this system, and if you change it, you take a risk, but you take a risk for the benefit of Canada. I don't think the population would say, “Oh, these guys are doing something in order to trick the system”, but rather, “They're doing something to improve Canada.”