Well, the question you'd have to ask the Supreme Court is whether or not that change would be constitutional. That would be your question. I am absolutely not certain that the Supreme Court would say yes, because we don't want to be in a situation in our country where we're expanding constantly what is constitutional. We want to continue to give Parliament its just due.
When it comes to numbers, numbers have been changed in the past without constitutional amendment. The thing that threw a bit of a wrench into the works was the Senate reform reference, because people have interpreted that to mean certain things. The one good thing about going to the Supreme Court is that maybe they'd clarify what they actually meant in that regard, and from a legal standpoint that would be great for us.