Thanks very much.
That allows me to pivot from there to the idea you mentioned that it doesn't have to be this way. I would agree that it doesn't have to be this way, but there are certain elements of Canadian reality that create some stickiness when we think about where and how we would change the federal nature of the country, such as constitutional requirements for seat allocation. I don't have to get down into that.
There is a constitutional legitimacy that needs to be met as we put forward electoral reform, as well as the political legitimacy that is attached to this. Canadians need to feel as though any reform is legitimate in their eyes. You addressed this with Mr. Ste-Marie in terms of the idea of moving quickly versus having to take our time to ensure we do things properly.
I've been listening to a bit of your testimony. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you would be okay with this being used as an opportunity to open up the Constitution and explore some dramatic changes for the country.