I think it is normal and healthy in our society, in the context of our committee discussions, that experts present completely divergent views.
I think it is worthwhile to mention that after these conversations with the experts, it will be necessary to hold a dialogue with the general public. Since this is a very technical and somewhat esoteric conversation, if you will, there is a risk that the general public will distance itself from the dialogue if it does not participate in it right from the outset.
That summarizes our position. We are not against the experts, far from it, but we cannot exclude the general public from the debate. At this stage, the discussions are a bit removed from the electorate, in our opinion.