Mr. Nater and Ms. Everitt provided part of the answer to your question.
Democracy is such a fascinating subject. We also tried to generate enthusiasm. To be honest, we were unsuccessful. We still managed to spark greater interest among a core group of the population, but that group remains small. There are now people who are passionate about the subject and convinced of the need to change the electoral system and the relevance of doing so. That said, I don't think the subject will inspire general enthusiasm. If we wait for a grassroots movement in favour of changing the electoral system, we may wait for centuries. It's as clear as that.
At some point, the governments must acknowledge the situation and the general analysis we're conducting. Almost everyone who studies our electoral system will recommend a change. It's inevitable, since the number of votes don't correspond to the number of seats. It's basic. It's undemocratic.
The system has still worked and Canada has performed well, as has each of our provinces.
That said, we can't wait for public enthusiasm. It won't happen. The population has so many other priorities.
For the future of the country, we need a leadership that recognizes the need for change and the risks of leaving the system in place.