I'm going to respond in English.
The public generally is in favour of referendums. They like the idea because the idea is that they're going to be consulted on something directly. We did a poll a month ago and found that 65% favour a referendum. That's not a surprise. People tend to say that the public should be consulted.
I'm not convinced that they would want two referendums though. The counter-argument is about the cost of these things, and it gets into the millions of dollars sometimes. We sometimes hear that kind of push-back. I'm not convinced that there's interest in two referendums, but I think there would be a lot of interest in one referendum once the committee has made its recommendation and we have a concrete option.
You know, there's a lot of fluidity in these results because the details are still unknown. We don't know what the choice is going to be. We tested three options. Well, I don't think a referendum is going to involve three options. To really get a solid handle on this, the public would need to know what the idea is.
Going back to Mr. Cullen's point about the details and the trade agreements and so forth, I think that once the public knows exactly what the details are, they'll understand the implications through the dialogue in the run-up. They'll understand the pros and cons. They will then know what it means to them, I think. They will know—