Again, I would point to the New Zealand experience. It had two referendums, so that the first time, New Zealanders were not making the definitive choice. I contrast that with the Ontario or P.E.I. experiences, or even the experience in British Columbia.
Voters showing up in Ontario to a provincial election thinking they were just going to be voting for their MPP suddenly were also asked this other question that there hadn't been a lot of discussion about. They hadn't been informed much about it, so it was not surprising then to get a “no to change” answer.
I think a process that has more time...and I understand that this may not be the case here. You may be working under constraints. I think that makes it more difficult if you expect to have a change in place for the next election. That brings me back to my testimony that this doesn't leave time for parties to adjust either or to change their infrastructures.