Yes. I'm suggesting that, instead of filling the 22nd, why don't bring in the key people we need to question then, as Nathan said, about why they haven't been following through, what's wrong, and so on, then follow through on the 12th again with sustainable development?
At the end of that meeting on the 12th, we'll decide who we need or what we think we need.
Let's get this thing put aside so that we can deal with the stuff that I think we're all really interested in here. I'd like to see it gone, because we have a deadline to get that report in as asked.