Sorry, Chair. That feels like a subcommittee thing to me again. What we've done in the past is important, and what recommendations were and weren't followed through on, but in terms of what we want to get into on CEPA, it's just informed by what was done in the past. It's not directed by what we've done in the past because times have changed since the last committee reviewed this 10 years ago.
That's scoping out, “Oh, we want to do pest management control acts for a meeting because that seems important, or if we want to look at CEPA's implication on air quality then that's a meeting.“
I think that comes back to this type of a forum rather than have witnesses and the whole committee here discussing it. It's strategizing how we would want to tackle CEPA.