Yes. I'll respond to Mr. Vellacott's question and perhaps explore an area where there may be some common ground.
When I suggested that other international conventions and regimes use the term “toxic”, I was not suggesting that their definition of toxic is identical to the definition under CEPA. There are different definitions, because the nature of the word “toxic” is that it deals with things that are harmful or poisonous. So you need to further define that if you're going to use that term in a regulatory regime.
We do indeed have different definitions. The question is whether any of those definitions do violence to the commonly understood definition of toxic and whether it's appropriate to label products toxic that are harmful or poisonous in certain contexts.