I would like to ask another brief question to Mr. Freeman. The representatives of the Canadian chemicals industry have suggested this morning that the term « toxic » be replaced by a reference to substances meeting the criteria of section 64. According to them, government advisers would even have stated that this would not lead to any constitutional challenge of the legislation. I know that, this morning, you provided us with your analysis of the Hydro-Quebec judgment, which had a significant impact in Quebec, as you know. I would like to know if you agree with that advice from the government which may be contrary to your own analysis.
On September 21st, 2006. See this statement in context.