Thank you.
I'd like to change the focus on the term just slightly. I appreciate the comment. I think there is consensus that there is risk if we change the term. I appreciated the comments on the international perspective on the term “toxic”.
The assessments done here in Canada are based on a risk-based assessment as opposed to a hazard-based assessment. If there is consistency throughout the international approach to assessments, if it's done differently, then you could come up with a different result.
So, again, Mr. Moffet, I'd appreciate your comments, and also those of the witnesses, on the way substances are assessed in Canada, as opposed to how assessments are done internationally.