Thank you.
The committee has heard a number of comments, more or less in agreement that context is everything. Of course, it falls that when a substance is listed, or indeed when it's not even listed, the context is something that has to be communicated. It's not solely a responsibility of government, although that's important, but it's also a responsibility of the proponents.
I would add that as to the Salt Institute's recommendation of creating another list, we would strongly recommend against that approach because it would further complicate an already complicated act, but perhaps more importantly, it would create potentially even more confusion than already exists. Especially when, let's say, a substance as the Salt Institute is recommending is added to another list and then evidence emerges that action has to be taken on that substance, then you have to remove the substance again and put it on another list. I think with that kind of proposal you're creating an opening for even more confusion and more delay.