I think you've understood my opinion quite well. It is indeed my opinion that it would be a very significant weakening of the act, in the sense that it's like painting a target on this act; you are really inviting potentially protracted and costly litigation. Again, as I said, in a worst case scenario we're risking jeopardizing the finding that we now have in federal constitutional jurisdictions.
On September 26th, 2006. See this statement in context.