Okay.
In terms of the assessment you folks engaged in, while the government was sometimes spending money—or at the very least promising to spend money--on green power and alternative fuels, at the same time it was sending subsidies to projects that contributed to greenhouse gas emissions, such as Mr. Jean's area of the tar sands. How was that reconciled within the government's own planning—that on the one hand we're spending tax money to lower greenhouse gas emissions and on the other hand we're spending tax money to encourage greenhouse gas emissions?