I'd like to put this in a broader context.
I've been reading the papers a lot lately, and they've been very hard on past governments and present governments for spending a lot of time and money talking about things and not doing enough? We should put this into context here. I'm not sure that putting more timelines into the statute is really going to be the answer. There are quite a few timelines in there already.
What we're looking for here, I think, and what the public is looking for, is an attitudinal change, a culture change in the way the statute is administered. I've suggested some small changes that I think could be made in the statute to facilitate that change. But at the end of the day what we should all be doing is investing in environmental management. We shouldn't be fighting each other over the labels or timelines or anything. We should be investing.