I want you to know that in Canada we use members of Parliament to try these things out on. I've had my blood measured. I'm in the competition for the most toxic politician in the country. That's one I don't want to win.
I'm going to make two assumptions, Mr. Denison, then I want to direct my question to Mr. Arseneau.
I am assuming—indeed, I would assume that this is generally true for the panel—that there's a huge industrial advantage to having common regimes, where possible, across large areas. That is to say, if you can get something that is good for the U.S., good for the European Union, and good for Canada, that's an industrial advantage. I'm also assuming that basically the three systems that are in place are systems of goodwill. That is to say, they are not corrupt. We can basically have some confidence in both the data and the assessments, even though they may be done in different ways, which would then mean we could have some confidence if we shared it.
Is that a good going-in assumption, Dr. Denison?