Sure. I can have a try at that.
That was the point I was trying to make in my presentation. One of the reasons the LOQ is there is because that is as low as you can measure. It doesn't make sense to talk about going any lower; that's the stopping point in terms of the aim that's set out in CEPA. That's very similar to the Stockholm Convention, where they talk about the goal being continuous minimization and, where feasible, ultimate elimination. I think CEPA is actually a bit stronger than that, because the feasible language isn't incorporated into the goal; it's incorporated into the social, technical, and economic measures of how to get there.
I think that's the reason the LOQ is part of the equation. It provides a stopping point that's necessary because you can't measure any lower.