Mr. Chair, in answer to that question, I believe it's a fair assessment.
Going back very quickly to the previous question, I believe that substitution prevents an opportunity, not a threat, to proponents. I'm not sure if Mr. Stack mentioned a study by the Toxics Use Reduction Institute. There are two studies I want to mention quickly on the subject of the feasibility of substitution and how it's being done in other jurisdictions. The Toxics Use Reduction Institute in Massachusetts published a report this summer called Five Chemicals Alternatives Assessment Study, and another is on the Greenpeace International website called Safer Chemicals Within Reach, clearly involving the REACH legislation in Europe.