There is no such thing as a point of clarification.
On the point of order, Mr. Chair, when the decision was challenged and your decision was upheld, there were a couple of principles operating. The first is that the committee is master of its own destiny. Second, the decision taken by Mr. Mills was taken on the advice of the clerk, so if there had been a problem with that decision at the time, the moment to make that point would have been to challenge Mr. Mills's decision, and that was not done. We are now in a position in which we are masters of our destiny; we have decided, through a challenge to you, Mr. Chair, to uphold the 10-minute rule, and now we must proceed with the matter at hand.