Yes, I'd be very happy to. Thank you very much for raising this question.
If you turn to page 8-5 in the main estimates, this relates to the first comment I made in the opening remarks, that we did change our program activity architecture. I know that's technical. What that means is that how we define our results was changed. That is why you see that there's nothing in there on the bottom, from reduced greenhouse gas emissions to adaptation, as you listed; there are no investments. However, there's a new activity architecture on the first nine categories that are presented in the main estimates. So what you would have if you turn to the report on plans and priorities on page 10, to the crosswalk...there you could see where the moneys have been aligned. For what would have been categorized under reduced greenhouse gas emissions, you have some...I think it's in the order of $18.5 million in net emissions of greenhouse gases are reduced. It's just a different way of defining it. If you like, we would be happy to provide you with a copy of that crosswalk and further information to explain that mapping.