That is fine with me. We can discuss the broad outline of the Kyoto Protocol, the cost, the mechanisms, but I am intent on doing one thing, and that is examining Bill C-288. I feel that it is important. Our mandate here is not Kyoto, we should try to see if we can amend this bill to make it acceptable to everyone. For example, clause 6 gives the provinces a certain amount of flexibility. That is something that concerns me greatly, and I would like to tighten up the definition and see how the provinces could implement the objectives that are set out in the bill's preamble.
We should devote some time to discussing how the provinces will implement this bill and how much flexibility they will be given. I do not know if one meeting will be enough, but this is something that we must certainly do. Personally, I do not think we will need more than one sitting out of six to discuss how these mechanisms to provide flexibility to the provinces would work. I think it is an interesting suggestion. And one meeting out of six is not too much to ask.