Mr. Chair, Tim has shared a list: urgency, impact, update on Kyoto, mechanisms and modelling, international, and then accountability, in that order, with some flexibility for the last four. We're in favour of that.
There are two topics, and I just want to clear up a comment from Mr. Bigras. The topics were not a work plan in that order. They were topics. If we can, I think we should incorporate these topics—which I think are important—into Mr. Godfrey's proposed work plan or the plan that Tim just shared with us.
The only two topics that I want to make sure are incorporated into that are the second and the third, which are action to date and previous plans. The other topics are being addressed with Mr. Godfrey's plan. The second and third could be incorporated into the update on Kyoto or into the urgency, which would be the first or third meeting. Either way, I think it's important that we learn from the past. We don't want to repeat mistakes.
That's my suggestion.