Just to follow up on Mr. Rodriguez' point, there's no suggestion in my comments to say that we need witnesses to tell us how it's going to happen, the outside commentary that I think is required in this.
To simply say it's the government's responsibility and the committee bears no responsibility for its calling upon government is irresponsible. It reminds me a lot of the complaints made over the 13 years after we signed Kyoto, for the years after Kyoto, that a number was picked. There was no plan in place. Where did we end up?
To simply suggest, though, that this is the number it's going to be and we're not going to listen to, from experts, what the likely or possible makeup of achieving those targets might look like...I don't understand why that would be a wrong-headed conversation for this bill.
So while I understand--