Yes, it is. That's because there was a lot of very good expert advice around, and it was being used by other countries, about the kinds of policies that you actually needed. When someone said, “This is a good bill for 1999”, I would say, “No, it still doesn't give you enough timeframe.” That was what I tried to say in my opening comments. The final point, though, is yes, graduated, we need time, but I believe the policy can be immediate.
We have talked about the details of these enough. We have countries that implemented carbon taxes fifteen years ago. So when I heard Ken saying--I thought I heard him say--by the end of the Kyoto period we should have the policies in place, I disagree with him completely. The policies can all be in place by next year. I would be greatly dismayed.... I was just meeting with someone from EPCOR the other day, who was telling me, “We're thinking of putting in a conventional coal-burning plant without capture”, and I'm thinking, my goodness, at the margin we can start to pay for some of these new kinds of technologies. We have to have the policy in place now.