This is not something I think about as much, but I was at an international meeting in England just a couple of weeks ago in which a Japanese delegate referred to Canada's shame in terms of all of this.
And I end up coming...first of all, I really don't like the word “targets”, because targets are what we've had before. They have to be obligations, constraints, backed by penalties. Anybody can set targets. In fact, we're all great at doing that. But what you're really talking about is an obligation, a requirement of what you're going to achieve and why and how, and it has to be laid out right through the economy, rather than talking about targets.
I think from Canada's point of view, though, our only choice now is simply to say to the international community that we screwed up, that this has not worked, and now here are the policies we're putting in place as part of goodwill. We won't be a leader by putting those policies in place, but we want to be among the countries that are driving forward with this now, and we'll carry that with us into future negotiations.