At some point I would like to be able to do the international comparison, but I'll just do the domestic comparison to the Pest Control Products Act. What we have in terms of comparing the existing substances to the new substances is that the Pest Control Products Act requires quite a bit more information, requires testing data on every substance, every pesticide on the market. I think one of the witnesses who came before the committee explained before that it's a weird thing that where companies make both chemicals that are not pesticides and chemicals that are pesticides, on the pesticide side they have to create all this data and on the other side they don't. So on the one hand, we feel the information requirements are weak particularly for existing substances, for which there are no information requirements, and for the new substances as well.
In addition to that, the new Pest Control Products Act now sets a different standard for confidentiality. It divides business confidential information from the test data related to health and the environment. You can go to the Pest Management Regulatory Agency and you can look at all that test data. It's public information now, and we believe that should be true for chemicals falling under CEPA as well.