That's a good point. One of the members mentioned earlier that even though we have seriously failed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the fact that we have been engaged in the Kyoto process has resulted in other programs and activities. So there are lots of other reasons for remaining a party to Kyoto.
I also want to mention that there are a lot of parallels drawn between the smoking issue and the resistance to the evidence that smoking was harmful, and the climate change campaign. There have been recent documentaries.
I want to suggest that there are other lessons we can learn from this on how quickly smoking became socially unacceptable. Why can't we make producing greenhouse gases by individuals socially unacceptable, so that somebody like me who drives an SUV would be considered a social deviant, just like somebody lighting up a cigarette in this room?