I don't think we know the answer to that question. Earlier on, Mr. Godfrey asked something about recalibrating. Let me put a hypothesis on the table. Suppose we say that by some date hopefully in the near future, we would simply stabilize our emissions—not reduce them, but stabilize them. So that year by year, they didn't continue to increase and would stop at a given level. That would be a fairly clear target. We would say that we are not going to grow them anymore.
I don't know how feasible that is or how much it would cost. I don't know if it would be reasonable to say we can do that in five years, or that we can do it by 2012. Could we go to the climate convention and say, we can't reduce our emissions, but by 2012 we will not increase them anymore, we will be on a track to stabilize them? That would be a clear target; it would give a message to the Canadian economy. It may help us in our international negotiations and with our international image.
I don't think we can answer that question, but it is a good question to ask.