Mr. Cullen, my discussions with the clerk have led me to believe that Mr. Dion has been invited, and we do have a set number of days. Now, because of the Liberal convention, we talked about this at the last committee meeting, whereby everything was basically going to be moved back by one day—and I hope I have that right, Mr. Clerk. My understanding of the motion, from what I've heard, is that we're simply trying to specifically schedule a specific individual who has been invited to this committee to appear on a specific date, and I don't think it's going to have any effect on the timelines whatsoever.
Would anybody else like to speak to that, or would you like to proceed to the vote?