I have a question for Mr. Wright.
In your discussion, obviously you want to make changes parallel to the Fisheries Act, as far as the penalties are concerned. I have some concerns with that, because when you're talking about the Fisheries Act, you're talking about water. Nobody owns the water. So when you're talking about penalties and so on, it's obvious we're just dealing with fish. But when you're talking about environmental protection, we're talking about whole different levels of property ownership that could be involved. And when you start talking about these penalties, where half goes to the person laying the charge, we're talking about whole different amounts of money and a whole different context, compared to the Fisheries Act.
I have some serious reservations with that. I was wondering if you would like to address this first, and if anybody else on the panel would like to give their input on that as well, please do so. Frankly, I don't think it's an equal or a fair comparison.