But the point I'm trying to make is that there seems to be enough flexibility in the legislation that if something is a commonly used product, like road salts, the department can somehow nuance its position and take that into account. Maybe the problem is that they didn't do that right away, and they should have.
It seems to me that, first, as I was saying at the beginning of my intervention, the law does allow context to be taken into account, and second, it really was, at the end of the day, in the case of road salt. I don't understand the problem.