I'll be quick.
I heard three questions. As to my comments about the government abandoning Kyoto, I've already explained the practical purposes. I think the government has abandoned Kyoto because it clearly doesn't intend to comply with the target.
I don't see that Bill C-288 has anything to do with a particular government's plan. Bill C-288 is about ensuring that the Government of Canada--whichever government happens to be in place--complies with our international legal obligations.
On the oil sands, Pembina and ten other major environmental organizations issued a statement last December calling for a moratorium on further oil sands development until such time as certain frameworks were put in place, including a commitment to move toward carbon-neutral, emissions-zero oil sands by 2020.
That brings me back to the comments I made about emissions trading. We belive that through a combination of emissions trading and new technologies, including carbon capture and storage, the oil sands sector has the financial and technical capability to move toward zero emissions by 2020. So we're not calling for an end to oil sands development, but we are calling for that industry to take full responsibility for its emissions.