Thank you very much.
I'd like to turn to Mr. Alvarez.
This is a question that Canadians would want to ask you, Mr. Alvarez. You are a representative of an industry that is experiencing record high prices and where I think increasingly we recognize that if there are costs attached with business—the whole concept of polluter pay—particularly in a time of high prices, industry should absorb those costs and should be part of a regulatory final emission system. Why is it that a company like Shell can suggest, for example, “Well, I don't think we can afford to do sequestration unless you give us a hand”, when they're making record high profits? I think most people would say it's only fair, if you're going to be making money, that you cover the costs of polluting the atmosphere.