Thanks very much, Mr. Godfrey.
Let me answer the question in two ways. As you well know, in the government of Mr. Chrétien, a plan that included targets for the oil and gas industry was put forward, on the basis of which we said we were prepared to proceed. When Mr. Martin was Prime Minister, and Mr. Dion was the Minister of the Environment, he put forward a plan that included targets for the large final emitters. We said we were prepared to proceed on the basis of that plan. We have said we are prepared to go, and we are waiting, and that's what I said in my presentation: show us the rules within certain parameters; we're ready to go.
I would add that there's something that goes beyond that in terms of where the money is being spent. The biggest biodiesel project in Canada is about to be started near Red Deer. The sponsor is Pioneer, which is a big refiner. The biggest wind generators in this country are TransAlta and Enbridge. The biggest user of solar power in this country is BP, the biggest sponsor of CO2 projects, capture and storage, are oil and gas companies, and the biggest ethanol producer in Canada is Suncor. The money that these companies are making is being reinvested into the ground in terms of real live projects.
So I guess, Mr. Godfrey, what we're saying is that we don't agree with the architecture of the Kyoto agreement, but it certainly does not and has not stopped us from saying we're prepared to proceed on the basis of a set of rules, once government makes them.