The reality is that we've had people who have testified in front of the committee. When I asked a question, I think it was Mr. Sauchyn who said setting unachievable goals was as bad a self-fulfilling prophecy as setting other goals that are too far in the distance. I believe it's the juxtaposition that was before the committee at the time. We're now setting goals in this particular clause that are only for the sake of setting goals and have no relevance.
I would only like to say that the government's proposals are new, and we're going in a different direction. We'll tackle the problem head on.
I would suggest that my colleagues and I will be voting no on this particular clause.