Thank you, Mr. Bigras. I would just like to point out a couple of things.
First of all, the Library of Parliament does not give a full legal opinion on any item. They simply give their opinion based on what they read. In terms of a solid legal opinion, I don't think that would be correct.
Secondly, Mr. Godfrey has pointed out that there are, of course, some other safety nets here when we get into the legal realm of constitutional law. They basically are report stage, third reading, and of course the Senate, at which time more of the legal constitutional issues can be dealt with. Our job here is to approve an amendment or oppose an amendment, to have a vote on that, and to move on. I don't think any of us here are constitutional lawyers or qualified to get into that.
I just clarify that to try to hopefully bring this to a close.
Mr. Cullen, you did have a comment at this point.