The point I was making on lead is that it was grandfathered into CEPA as toxic. There wasn't even a need for an assessment report back in the early 1990s.
We know that lead is toxic. My concern is not about overlap; it's about a gap when something is toxic under CEPA and this steady stream of consumer products can continue. We can talk for six years about the need for regulating this junk, but the only thing that gets regulated is 1% of the problem. That's a gap, and it's a problem that needs to be addressed. It needs to be put into a discussion around concern about overlap. I'm more concerned about gaps.