Presently, the way the department views the distinction is that the Hazardous Products Act would deal with the product in its entirety. It could deal with the individual ingredients in it, but it tends to deal with the product itself.
For example, there has been a lot of attention to baby walkers and those sorts of things. So the product itself is dangerous; its design is one that is problematic for the consumers. Another example is those little bath seats for giving babies a bath. There have been a number of drownings. The baby walkers were designed such that they could fall down stairs.
So it tends to deal with the product itself, whereas CEPA tends to regulate the ingredients.
The Hazardous Products Act, though, will prevent the sale of those products that might continue to have those ingredients, so it can be covered off at both ends—for example, products containing certain forms of asbestos and how those are controlled.