There is an interplay between the two...there is and there isn't. The announcement is a significant step forward in that it takes 200, in particular, of the most harmful substances that have been identified through the process and it puts them on a track toward regulation. That's a very significant step.
The reason I say it's a significant step is that the next step is to ensure that our overall system for regulating potentially harmful substances deals with threats on a systematic basis. Let me give you just a practical example that relates to the chemical management plan.
Under the chemical management plan, for the first batch of chemicals, the government will issue a challenge to industry. Industry has six months to show that the substance is effectively managed, safely managed, and if they can't do that, then six months following that--so starting in January 2008--they will consider putting the substance on schedule 1 or scheduling it for virtual elimination.
That only starts a further process, which under the current situation, under the current act, takes another three and a half years before you actually get to regulations hitting the ground. So we are actually four and a half years away right now from the first batch of substances being actually regulated on the ground, unless the recommendations that we've put forward on mandatory timelines are put in place. These would cut that down to two and a half years.