On the portions you quoted, they're always couched in judge's language, and certain words have implications. But there certainly seems to be some strong indication of caution and wariness over the danger of altering the word “toxic” and reopening the act to some potential challenges. I'm not sure if Ms. Mitchell--or who--can comment on that from CIELAP.
Is that fair to say? For the average person listening, the language you quoted might sound rather bland.