Again, Mr. Vellacott, the initial portion needs to be in camera because of the nature of what we're going to hear, which, as I said, is a heads-up to us.
The rest of the meeting about this same subject, about reporting, obviously the public has every right to know about. I'm not a fan of in camera meetings either and have opposed them in many cases. I felt that, having listened to the Auditor General on what she wants to tell us, it has to be in camera or it can't be said. It's a heads-up as to what's happening in the future.
We have mixed the issues a bit, and that could be my fault for not better clarifying what this is about, but you will be very clear when you hear what the Auditor General has to say, if it's in camera.
Mr. Bigras.