Aren't there any consequences or dangers in including the Commissioner's report in the general audit report? Wouldn't that bury this entire environmental audit in a broader audit? The wish of committee members is that the audit be as independent as possible, precisely so that the report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development enjoys some visibility.
So wouldn't more independence be preferable, rather than burying these results among broader indicators? Ultimately, what the public expects — and this is the priority for citizens — is to know more about what goes on in government in the environmental field.