Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I'd like to go back to the statement you made yesterday before the committee, particularly since it's now public. Paragraph 13 reads:
According to some of our advisors, there is a gap between the expectations of certain persons regarding the Commissioner's role and the mandate [...]
I must tell you I fell off my chair reading the example that you then gave:
[...] to what extent can or should the Commissioner defend a cause with respect to a government policy issue?
And you nearly suggest that the committee look into this matter.
So I would like to ask you two questions. First, who are these people who communicated with your advisors to point out this gap? Second, do you think that Ms. Gélinas was perhaps a little too militant in favour of the environmental cause relative to the mandate that was given her under the act?