The issue is relatively simple. I believe that Ms. Fraser has put her trust in us by coming to present to us what she was going to announce in the afternoon concerning Ms. Gélinas. I believe we all appreciated getting that information before everyone, in that it was even out of respect for us that she did it, and she formally asked us that it be done in camera and that this information not be circulated before she had her press conference. I understand her: she didn't want the information to come out all wrong before she had her press conference. She showed respect by coming and making this presentation to us. However, if we disclose information, I believe that the next time someone comes here, there will be some reluctance. Then we'll understand why not all the information is given to us. That's an effect.
When I asked Ms. Fraser earlier whether it was possible for something that happened in camera subsequently to become public, if that set a precedent... Once again, if someone comes and makes a presentation to us in camera, that in camera meeting must be respected. Otherwise, it's as though we had asked someone to tell us a secret, but we went and told it to everyone. It becomes a little complex. I believe it's a matter of trust. Perhaps I'm a little naive, but that's how things work, I believe.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.