Well, I would have to say that I was very nervous, because I could almost see and predict where this was heading when there were, right from the get-go, members of the opposition, Mr. McGuinty in particular, making a big issue about the media outside and questions for him, and he went on about this at length, and several times in fact. So my sense at that point was that this scenario could well develop, of something of a confidential meeting being leaked out, because there was all this lathering up about the media out there. And I thought, well, if it's a confidential meeting, with confidential documents, what does that matter? It's not really the issue we should be discussing at this point.
I'd like members of the opposition, the member I named, to think deeply in their hearts, do we want this kind of pattern occurring? I think it's a tremendous breach of what goes on here. It's a difficult circumstance as it is when we get in these committee meetings, but when we have people who are not holding things in confidence, it's a very unsettling and disturbing precedent for any member of this committee to do, and I don't appreciate it.
I did see members meeting with the media, off in huddles in corners. Mr. McGuinty was in fact with a particular named reporter. It left me a bit uneasy that that would occur within minutes of the meeting being over. Why are these confidential huddles going on when in fact this is a confidential meeting?