We believe that the nomination of an interim commissioner is a time to reflect upon how we can improve that practice, if we can, before we go ahead with the search for a new commissioner. That is why I brought the review forward here; otherwise, there would be an expectation, quite frankly, that we would begin a search process right away.
I would like to take the time, before just automatically going out, to say that the commissioner's office and that part of our mandate has been in place now for 12 years. I think it's time to take a look at it and to really focus on what qualifications are needed for the next commissioner. As part of that review—and we've already begun some very initial consultation—the issue around policy advocacy and advice to government is coming up.