Obviously, I'm the one who made the decision when the Auditor General approached me and said, “I would like to give a heads-up in camera and it's regarding a position.” Obviously that was her intention, and I think that's what she did. Of course, by us going ahead, obviously it was in camera. Everyone was advised that it was in camera; it was in camera. I think everyone stayed in the room and agreed it was in camera, and obviously that confidence was broken. So that's the problem that cannot happen. If it's in camera, it's in camera; if it's not in camera, it's not.
I take your advice, obviously. I have fought that in camera thing for years. I don't like having meetings in camera. I wasn't elected in camera. I don't believe we should have those kinds of meetings. However, when the Auditor General came to me with that specific request, the clerk and I talked about it. She approached both of us. We talked about it, we brought that to the committee, and we carried on. I think that's the point that needs to be made, it has been made, and I really believe we can drop it at that point.
We do have time, but Mr. Vellacott, is this something new?